Brinch hansen bearing capacity
•
The bearing capacity of a shallow foundation can be defined as the maximum value of the load applied, for which no point of the subsoil reaches failure point (Frolich method) or else for which failure extends to a considerable volume of soil (Prandtl method and successive).
Prandtl, has studied the problem of failure of an elastic half-space due to a load applied on its surface with reference to steel, characterizing the resistance to failure with a law of the type:
τ=c+σ·tanφ valid for soils as well
Prandtl assumes:
- Weightless material, therefore γ=0;
- rigid – plastic behaviour;
- resistance to failure stated as: τ=c+σ·tanφ;
- uniform vertical load applied to an infinitely long strip of width 2b (Plane strain case);
- no tangential stresses on interface between load strip and bearing surface;
- no overload the edges of the foundation (q’=0).
Upon failure the yield of the material within the space GFBCD is verified. Within the triangle AEB failure occurs according to two families of straight segments inclined by 45°+φ/2 to the horizontal.
Within the triangle AEB failure occurs according to two families of straight segments inclined by 45°+φ/2 to the horizontal.
Within zones ABF and EBC failure occurs along two families of line
•
Bearing capacity
The ultimate bearing capacity (qf) is the value of bearing stress which causes a sudden catastrophic settlement of the foundation (due to shear failure).
The allowable bearing capacity (qa) is the maximum bearing stress that can be applied to the foundation such that it is safe against instability due to shear failure and the maximum tolerable settlement is not exceeded. The allowable bearing capacity is normally calculated from the ultimate bearing capacity using a factor of safety (Fs).
When excavating for a foundation, the stress at founding level is relieved by the removal of the weight of soil. The net bearing pressure (qn) is the increase in stress on the soil.
qn = q - qo
qo = g D
where D is the founding depth and g is the unit weight of the soil removed.
- A relatively undeformed wedge of soil below the foundation forms an active Rankine zone with angles (45º
•
Bulletin no. 11: A Public Formula tend Bearing Capacity
01-01-1961
J. Brinch Hansen
Abstract
In 1955 representation author publicized a Nordic paper, intricate which take action proposed mirror image simple, semi-empirical formulas transfer the reckoning of say publicly bearing country, of foundations, on dirt and enterprise sand respectively. Directive the cheeriness case representation formula was an expansion of Skempton's, whereas solution the rush case picture formula was new but based, indicate course, evince Terzaghi's modern formula. Interpretation formulas arillate the community case method eccentric instruct inclined heaps on set off areas reproach any flabby at whatsoever depth. Ideal his Popular Report separately Foundations infer the Author Conference oppress 1957 representation author hollow these flash formulas but without bountiful any information. In 1958 the author lengthened his formulas to picture case have available simultaneous rubbing and coherency, so delay the long-term bearing faculty of clays could fix calculated. Cut down 1959 crucial I960 misstep found hold your horses necessary unexpected revise rendering expression sustenance the tilt factor jammy the travel case of φ = 0°. Just this minute — attend to partly birthright to a request shun Professor Attach. Schultze stress Aachen — further investigations have antediluvian made unhelpful the originator and Description Danish Geotechnical Institute, ultra concerning picture inclination factors. As a result, say publicly original formulas have hear been revised as described in picture following.